A team of aging but badass mercenaries is tasked to eliminate various nemeses.
The Sylvester Stallone-directed “The Expendables” (4/5 stars) burst onto the action movie scene in 2010 with the promise of uniting a star-studded cast of iconic action heroes. It consequently delivered a nostalgic and adrenaline-pumping experience for fans of the genre. It was cheesy, fun, and had bullets and blood galore.
However, as the series progressed, it became evident that the quality of “The Expendables” movies declined. While Stallone’s initial installment captured the essence of classic action films, blending humor, camaraderie, and intense action sequences, the subsequent entries struggled to recapture that magic. Each installment felt more like a tired rehash of past glories rather than a fresh take on the genre.
One glaring issue contributing to the declining quality was the reliance on a formulaic and predictable plot structure. The films became increasingly predictable, recycling the same basic premise of a team of mercenaries embarking on a dangerous mission, facing a powerful adversary, and overcoming insurmountable odds. This lack of innovation led to a sense of monotony, starting from Simon West’s still-somewhat-fun “The Expendables 2” (3/5 stars), leaving audiences yearning for more creativity and depth in the storytelling. The movies seemed to prioritize explosions and gunfire over a compelling narrative, sacrificing substance for style.
Another noticeable drawback was the overemphasis on aging action stars, often at the expense of introducing fresh and dynamic characters. While including iconic figures like Sylvester Stallone, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and Bruce Willis initially generated excitement, it eventually became a crutch for the series. Patrick Hughes brought Harrison Ford, Mel Gibson, and Wesley Snipes into the mix (among many other “has-beens”) in his “The Expendables 3” (2/5 stars), to no particular avail. The over-reliance on these aging stars limited the potential for introducing new, engaging characters and exploring different dynamics within the team. As a result, the films started to feel like a nostalgic reunion rather than a genuine attempt to push the boundaries of the action genre.
Moreover, the quality of the action sequences also declined as the series progressed. What was once a selling point — the promise of breathtaking stunts and intense combat scenes — began to feel repetitive and uninspired. The choreography and execution of action scenes in later films lacked the innovation and creativity that distinguished the genre in its heyday. As a result, the once-thrilling set pieces felt like mere echoes of the past, failing to provide the pulse-pounding excitement that fans had come to expect from the franchise.
In conclusion, “The Expendables” movies, while initially a promising homage to the golden age of action cinema, experienced a noticeable decline in quality as the series continued, resulting in the abysmal box-office flop that was “The Expendables 4” (or “Expend4bles,” 1.5/5 stars – and that’s just for the horrible title). Formulaic plots, the continuous banking on aging stars, and a lack of creativity in action sequences contributed to a sense of stagnation. While the films may still appeal to die-hard fans of the genre, the declining quality raises questions about the franchise’s future and whether it can ever recapture the magic that made the first installment a nostalgic hit.
Now available on a 4K Ultra HD™ Exclusive SteelBook
