In a future dystopian America, a wrongfully accused and convicted policeman gets his shot at freedom when he’s forced to participate in a TV game show where convicts called Runners must battle killers for their freedom.
Edgar Wright’s talents as a filmmaker have long impressed me, particularly through his acclaimed CORNETTO trilogy—of which “Hot Fuzz” remains my personal favorite. News that Wright would direct a new adaptation of “The Running Man,” starring the ever-rising Glen Powell, sparked genuine excitement. With such a pairing, what could go wrong? As it turns out, the issue was less about missteps and more about creative differences. Wright’s approach, I understand, stays truer to Stephen King’s original novel. Yet, having grown up in the 1980s, my frame of reference is the original film—a production tailored to Arnold Schwarzenegger’s strengths, brimming with action and camp. That version delivered exactly what one expected.
The trailers for Wright’s film hinted at a more humorous tone, but upon viewing, I found the final product largely devoid of comedy, save for the occasional moment. Instead, it focused intently on portraying a grim dystopian society obsessed with reality television. In that respect, Wright’s direction was skillful. Still, I left the theater feeling indifferent—neither thrilled nor satisfied.
The 1987 version, scripted by Steven E. de Souza and directed by Paul Michael Glaser, notably diverges from King’s book. Instead of following protagonist Richards as he flees across America over the course of a month, the film confines him to a game zone. There, Schwarzenegger’s Richards must survive a gauntlet of stalkers—gladiator-like assassins—within a controlled environment. The motivations differ as well: while King’s Richards volunteers to support his family, the film’s Richards is a single man, wrongfully accused of a heinous crime. He, along with two others, must clear his name by battling their way through the deadly maze.
Though both films draw from the novel’s basic outline, Schwarzenegger’s version stands out for its sheer entertainment value. It is replete with the actor’s signature campy one-liners and, though nearly forty years old and unmistakably dated, was a thrill to watch in theaters at the time. It captured Schwarzenegger’s ascent to stardom, and his confrontations with the stalkers were unabashedly violent fun.
The chemistry between Schwarzenegger and María Conchita Alonso is notable, with both actors holding their own. The supporting cast—including Yaphet Kotto, Mick Fleetwood, and Dweezil Zappa—adds depth. Richard Dawson, best known as the host of “Family Feud,” delivers a memorable performance as Damon Killian, the ruthless, ratings-obsessed host of the game show. Dawson’s portrayal is chilling, combining malevolence with a charismatic edge.
In every aspect, the film is a quintessential product of the 1980s. Schwarzenegger’s infectious enjoyment on screen—delivering quips as he dispatches villains—remains memorable. While both adaptations share the novel’s core narrative, there is no denying which is more entertaining. For sheer camp, humor, and over-the-top action, Schwarzenegger’s “The Running Man” stands alone.
Now available on Blu-ray™ + Digital
10k
20k
1.5k
2.2k